This one looked all but done the other day, now not so likely. I think it's going to drag and I think United will miss out on him in the end through their own stupidity and stubbornness.
If they can't afford it then they best accept being a 4th best team for the long term then.If we can't afford to pay £110m for a player then that isn't stupidity or stubbornness that's reality of life or business you can't spend what you don't have.
A deal might get done and it might still be for a lot of money but Utd need to do everything they can to force that price down even if it only saves £1m that's still £1m in our bank and not theirs.
Not sure on your theory there but i respect what you are saying. If we got hold of a decent RF for £40m (I hear Zaha could be had for that just as an example) and then took Grealish for £65m. That's £5m less than Sancho would cost and are you telling me that we would come 4th with quality additions like that?If they can't afford it then they best accept being a 4th best team for the long term then.
If they can't afford it then they best accept being a 4th best team for the long term then.
We'd be in competition with about 5 or 6 other big clubs at that point, i think it's now or never.Or we look for someone we can afford instead and go for him next summer or January when the price is dropping.
We'd be in competition with about 5 or 6 other big clubs at that point, i think it's now or never.
There aren't many players we go for and miss out on with this much noise surrounding it, especially in recent history. We'll get him I'm sure.
United had Zaha, he's really not that good or special. He wouldn't really improve the first team though he would add depth.Not sure on your theory there but i respect what you are saying. If we got hold of a decent RF for £40m (I hear Zaha could be had for that just as an example) and then took Grealish for £65m. That's £5m less than Sancho would cost and are you telling me that we would come 4th with quality additions like that?
Had we played him, he would have improved our side greatly. In his current state there are better players available for whatever amount he would cost.United had Zaha, he's really not that good or special. He wouldn't really improve the first team though he would add depth.
I recall saying this about Shearer around the late 90's but he resurrected himself in stunning fashion so I am a bit shy of such statements these days.Both our strikers outscored Kane this season didn’t they?
I think he’s done at his top level to be honest. Lost that yard of pace he had.
Yes your rite but he’s a diffrent animal to what we got I feel a proper striker is what we need , there like gold dust a van nistleroy or Owen in there prime ones that aren’t afraid to take a risk
Spot on. I recall very clearly I wasn’t overly happy with how we played as a team during the RVN years. It was all about him.But generally don’t help a team that wins titles. Owen won one league title in his career, sitting on the bench for us. We won 1 league title in 5 years with Ruud. Won 3 titles in a row either side of him joining and leaving. (From memory haven’t doubled checked either). A striker like them 2 makes a team one dimensional and easier to stop. A team is much better off having goals from everywhere than going through one man.
Not suggesting you are wrong and it is a shame we missed out on Haaland as he would have been the ideal signing for me. However, i do think there is risk with Kane given the price we would pay for him, despite the point I made about Shearer above.I just feel we definitely need a striker to compete at the top look at lewondowski
met could have got halaand if we gave him a starting place , couldn’t halaand have went in the middle with martial and rashford either side?Not suggesting you are wrong and it is a shame we missed out on Haaland as he would have been the ideal signing for me. However, i do think there is risk with Kane given the price we would pay for him, despite the point I made about Shearer above.
If Martial has turned a corner and Greenwood becomes striker if we sign Sancho you start to wonder how it would all work. I wish we had that problem to worry about over the previous few years.
God bless Ole
To be honest, although most seem to disagree I still believe there is room in the modern game for playing with two strikers as and when it suits. As of the upcoming season, we need to not only make big improvement on our seasons points tally but also our goal tally. We should be scoring 4 in games much more regular. That has become a once in a blue moon thing for us.I
met could have got halaand if we gave him a starting place , couldn’t halaand have went in the middle with martial and rashford either side?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.