Sideshow Bob
Avatar & New Members Forum Mod
- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 43,167
Totally ridiculous thing to say.We should be looking elsewhere. He's injury-prone for starters, but his main problem is his brainlessness.
You are probably right in that assessment. We do far too much "is he or isnt he" when they have been given enough opportunity to prove "they are" but haven't and therefore change is needed. Martial has been given amazing support by Ole to prove himself, given his coveted shirt number back etc and "he hasn't". And in my opinion "he isn't"I think Bailly can make some strange rash decisions.
For me, he's not good enough or reliable enough to be part of a main pairing. He either accepts that or moves on.
You are probably right in that assessment. We do far too much "is he or isnt he" when they have been given enough opportunity to prove "they are" but haven't and therefore change is needed. Martial has been given amazing support by Ole to prove himself, given his coveted shirt number back etc and "he hasn't". And in my opinion "he isn't"
But then you think to Shaw who wasn't but now suddenly very much "is". I lie awake at night thinking about this extraordinary transformation. As much as I love the NEW Shaw, I cant help but think we were previously being cheated. Its the most remarkable turnaround I have ever known.
So just what would be considered a decent fee then? Is it not injuries that has prevented more regular appearances? Why would that change elsewhere?More reports today that he’s going to turn down a new deal and wants to leave this summer in search of more regular first team football.
See no reason to stand in his way hopefully get a decent fee and invest it in a defender who can stay fit and contribute more to the first team put real pressure on the first team.
So just what would be considered a decent fee then? Is it not injuries that has prevented more regular appearances? Why would that change elsewhere?
A decent fee is entirely relative to how much money we need to raise to fund incomings. If we have the usual 70m and are looking to spend 150m then we're going to need Bailly to return more than if we're only looking to spend 100m.So just what would be considered a decent fee then? Is it not injuries that has prevented more regular appearances? Why would that change elsewhere?
By my mathematicas that comes to 1400 quidA decent fee is entirely relative to how much money we need to raise to fund incomings. If we have the usual 70m and are looking to spend 150m then we're going to need Bailly to return more than if we're only looking to spend 100m.
If it's Inter Milan I'd be charging them a little more for the delayed payments on Lukaku.
3 year deal? Either we are the world's biggest money laundering operation, or whomever decided this was a god idea was dropped on their heads too many times as a baby. Rojo Mk II.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.