Really, isn't down to the manager to manage the team?
If you hire someone to run the bank of England if it's doing badly, and it continues to do badly, do you sack all the staff, or the guy brought in to manage them?
All these players have played to higher standard while at united. If they are not doing so now, for me, the problem is with the management.
He could drop Rashford, he could tell Bruno to stop being so wasteful. He could give payers like Eriksen, Amad minutes over the last weeks, so they are not completely match unfit when they are expected to come on and turn a game. He could teach them to not be so easy to break down.
Maybe they are dispondant because their ability is not being maximised by the coaching staff, demoralising. I wonder if INEOS have conducted players interviews.
Ole got slaughtered on this forum, somehow ETH is immune. All the people on here saying you can't keep changing managers are the ones who wanted all the other managers sacked. The only members I recall backing all the other managers are me and IDFD.
And I differ from my normal way of thinking on managers on ETH because out of all of them, he appears absolutely clueless and out of his depth.