Cost saving is good if it's multilateral, but it's not, getting rid of 250 people barely pays Mounts and Shaws wagesIt doesn't sit well when part of the reason for the club losing money for the last 5 years is.
Debt Payments due to the ownership
Debt increasing due to our debt being held in dollars rather than pounds.
Dividend payments due to the ownership
The costs associated to the sale of shares to INEOS being dumped on the club.
The big decisions that have cost the club money will not have been made by the near 400-500 people who have either lost their jobs or are about to lose their jobs.
The Glazers really did run this place into the ground and fans are about to be asked to pick up the bill with another round of ticket price increases on the horizon.
I was under the impression that part of the INEOS deal was that dividend payments were frozen for two years.It doesn't sit well when part of the reason for the club losing money for the last 5 years is.
Debt Payments due to the ownership
Debt increasing due to our debt being held in dollars rather than pounds.
Dividend payments due to the ownership
The costs associated to the sale of shares to INEOS being dumped on the club.
The big decisions that have cost the club money will not have been made by the near 400-500 people who have either lost their jobs or are about to lose their jobs.
The Glazers really did run this place into the ground and fans are about to be asked to pick up the bill with another round of ticket price increases on the horizon.
Cost saving is good if it's multilateral, but it's not, getting rid of 250 people barely pays Mounts and Shaws wages
I was under the impression that part of the INEOS deal was that dividend payments were frozen for two years.
Wasn’t the goal something like win the league by 2027. I guess that’s probably still the end dream but got to be realistic and we probably are looking like a Europa league team at best for a bit.4years, what's happened to project 21
Apart from the fact he never actually existed?Unpopular opinion with hindsight but maybe the Sheik buying the club and clearing the debt would have been the better option, I guess we`ll never know.
I’ve heard the rumours he didn’t exist but never seen it provenWhy am I getting the feeling we've jumped out of the frying pan into the fire with INEOS ?
Apart from the fact he never actually existed?
If he did, he never had the finances to back up his claims.
Will give him a chance, just hope Wilcox isn't going to be too involved in decision making. Oh just checked that's who he's going to reporting to.Just looked him up, put on gardening leave after 7 months at Chelsea
They need a couple of mid 20's signings just for a little bit of experience in the squad tooWhy wouldn’t he report to Wilcox?
Everything coming out of the club suggests they won’t be going near players like Osihmen anymore.
They’ll be searching for the next Osihmen.
I think this guys main role will be modernising our scouting system to make sure we are targeting the right players.
They need a couple of mid 20's signings just for a little bit of experience in the squad too
What he says is going to upset a couple of posters on here![]()
Sir Jim Ratcliffe interview: Man Utd co-owner says some players are 'not good enough' and 'overpaid'
Some Manchester United players are "not good enough" and some are "overpaid", the club's co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe tells BBC sports editor Dan Roan.www.bbc.co.uk
Welcome to Stretford End Arising's forum, a friendly thriving Manchester United community.
Join the forum in less than one minute and discuss the latest United news with fellow fans! You will need to REGISTER (click the word 'register') to reply to discussions and create your own threads.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.