- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,181
That's a strange one as Trippier would cost more than we'd get for Dalot, and I'm not sure Trippier is that much better than Dalot to justify the extra outlay on a position we don't need to spend time or the money on.
Guess it all depends on what the numbers are if the Dalot fee basically covers the Trippier signing I think it’s a good bit of business.
Think with Dalot is he needs to play to improve because he does need to improve and at Utd we aren’t able to give him the games. His contract must be close to being up as well.
Trippier is a seasoned pro got plenty of experience in big games from what I’ve seen he’s a lot better than Dalot.
Don’t really see what the fuss is with him whenever he’s played for us he’s looked pretty average.