SuperRash
Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
- Messages
- 10,887
- Age
- 37
Not sure many League One strikers would be getting 10 goals in 13 European games. So yeah a complete over exaggeration.In your opinion.
Not sure many League One strikers would be getting 10 goals in 13 European games. So yeah a complete over exaggeration.In your opinion.
That's still less than 1 per game, nothing to brag aboutNot sure many League One strikers would be getting 10 goals in 13 European games. So yeah a complete over exaggeration.
Oh sorry it is a terrible record, awful figures not hitting the 1 per game mark.That's still less than 1 per game, nothing to brag about
![]()
European golden shoe 2024/2025 ranking
This page shows the 2024/2025 ranking of the highest goal scorers in europe's top 5 leagues. 1) Mohamed Salah - 25 goals, 2) Harry Kane - 21 goals, 2) Mateo Retegui - 21 goals, 4) Robert Lewandowski - 20 goals, 5) Erling Haaland - 19 goals, 5) Alexander Isak - 19 goals...europeangoldenshoe.com
It's you that's on the wind up!Oh sorry it is a terrible record, awful figures not hitting the 1 per game mark.
This is where our conversation ends because you are clearly on the wind up.
He wasn't called a championship player. They said he wouldn't get in to a league 1 side. Nonsense like that should be called out regardless of your opinion on him. He'd score 50 goals in that league if people could get him the ball.I can see why somebody would say he's a championship player, because he cannot score in the prem. And there aren't many teams below us to loan him out to.
I think it's easy to just blame Hojlund and absolve the manager of blame.I think it's easy to just blame the manager.
Goodness me, you really have it in for Amorin. Maybe the manager is doing what he thinks will best help the team and get them playing to his style. He's got to start somewhere. That's not letting someone down, its doing what needs to be done.We shouldn't be naive when judging Hojlund and understand the manager is letting him down and he is very young.
We aren't doing what needs to be done. Hence our results and having one shot on target yesterday. The forward play is non existent and we are criticising a striker for not scoring when not a single chance was created for him. The fact he didn't score yesterday wasn't on him when he didn't have a single chance to score.Goodness me, you really have it in for Amorin. Maybe the manager is doing what he thinks will best help the team and get them playing to his style. He's got to start somewhere. That's not letting someone down, its doing what needs to be done.
A very fair post. Hojlund can be criticised once he starts missing chances that are created. Until then the issue is a manager issue not a striker issue.I think it's fair to say both managers have let him down to some degree it isn't just Amorim.
Neither manager has managed to build a side that creates a lot of chances for anyone let alone the strikers. The ETH system certainly seemed to favour the wide players getting chances more that the centre forward.
Amorim I think has just looked to work on control of games which has certainly come at a cost going forward.
If the ball was constantly flying into the box and he was nowhere to be seen I could get the criticism of him but that position has been a tough one for anyone to play for the last 18 months.
You failing to see that Hojlund is part of the problem. It's getting to the point the players won't even pass to him because it's pointless.We aren't doing what needs to be done. Hence our results and having one shot on target yesterday. The forward play is non existent and we are criticising a striker for not scoring when not a single chance was created for him. The fact he didn't score yesterday wasn't on him when he didn't have a single chance to score.
You put prime Ronaldo in his spot nothing changes.You failing to see that Hojlund is part of the problem. It's getting to the point the players won't even pass to him because it's pointless.
You put a half decent striker in that squad the results and performances change
As for @jsp he doesn't get the chances because he's never in the right place.
You failing to see that Hojlund is part of the problem. It's getting to the point the players won't even pass to him because it's pointless.
You put a half decent striker in that squad the results and performances change
As for @jsp he doesn't get the chances because he's never in the right place.
Who do people think would be a better replacement out of Gyokeres and OsimhenHopefully we'll get a decent striker in this window and we'll see.
Even Zirkzee improves our team ffs
I think you would have to say Osimhen has more pedigree and the better CV but really like the look of Gyokeres. He’s got experience of English football albeit at a division below but he has everything in his locker to be a top striker in the EPL. Plus Osimhen does seem to come with a reputation of being a little disruptive. So I think Gyokeres for me.Who do people think would be a better replacement out of Gyokeres and Osimhen
Thats not the issue and it is their responsibility to put it in the right place. It is Rasmus problem when he does not start to convert them. Thats said he tries too many times to fight with the CB in the central positions. I think he is not a player who is going to play with his back to goal or hopeful punts. The runs will come when the balls are played into the right spaces and if he does not make those runs or convert those chances then he is gone.You failing to see that Hojlund is part of the problem. It's getting to the point the players won't even pass to him because it's pointless.
You put a half decent striker in that squad the results and performances change
As for @jsp he doesn't get the chances because he's never in the right place.
Yeah you make a valid point about Osimhen having more pedigree in a competitive leagueI think you would have to say Osimhen has more pedigree and the better CV but really like the look of Gyokeres. He’s got experience of English football albeit at a division below but he has everything in his locker to be a top striker in the EPL. Plus Osimhen does seem to come with a reputation of being a little disruptive. So I think Gyokeres for me.
How can you cross to a payer when he runs in a staight line surrounded by defenders. Never checks his runs.Thats not the issue and it is their responsibility to put it in the right place. It is Rasmus problem when he does not start to convert them. Thats said he tries too many times to fight with the CB in the central positions. I think he is not a player who is going to play with his back to goal or hopeful punts. The runs will come when the balls are played into the right spaces and if he does not make those runs or convert those chances then he is gone.
Actually he starts those runs but we hold the ball for too long. Everyone wants to carry it instead of the ball doing the work. Even Bruno tires to carry forward. The only early pass is the long punt forward.How can you cross to a payer when he runs in a staight line surrounded by defenders. Never checks his runs.
How can you get the ball out wide to progress down the pitch when your 9 cannot retain possession.
We get a decent striker, we get more goals.
Osimhen or Gyokeres. We don't have the money for either of these. You could probably get Duran for those prices.
We need to be shopping in lidl not waitrose. I see value in a loan for Ferguson to see if he can live up to the hype. Jonathon David. Either of these aren't a massive upgrade on goals, but certainly link up play. Sesko may be available for cheaper than those 2. Maybe we can push Hojlund in the other direction to raise the funds.
Is that the same Duran who's scored 12 goals in 43 league appearances over these last two seasons?You could probably get Duran for those prices.
I didn't say anyone was a league 1 striker. You've got the wrong poster.Is that the same Duran who's scored 12 goals in 43 league appearances over these last two seasons?
I thought figures like those had you earmarked as a League One striker.
he really doesn't.Actually he starts those runs
I didn't say anyone was a league 1 striker. You've got the wrong poster.
What I did say was, we need a forward who is better at holding the ball up. We get that, we get more chances.
Plus, he is generally used as a sub, so less minutes. This season he has a goal every 30 mins. Hojlund is a goal every 500 mins
Come on. Clearly on the manager. We are blaming the player for the 10 behind him failing to create a chance?Really poor again last night.
Did he even have a shot?
He really looks like he’s nowhere near ready and the club will have to make a tough call on him this summer.
I guess Amorin must've drummed it into him how not to trap a ball.Clearly on the manager.
Welcome to Stretford End Arising's forum, a friendly thriving Manchester United community.
Join the forum in less than one minute and discuss the latest United news with fellow fans! You will need to REGISTER (click the word 'register') to reply to discussions and create your own threads.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.