Avatar & New Members Forum Mod
- May 8, 2011
Match discussion thread for discussing Victor Lindelof's performances.
He and Maguire just don't work as a partnership. They both lack the pace to cover for each other and both lack the pace in one on one situations. Both are good players in their own right. Maguire is a very good defender and I think Lindelof could be too. I could see him going to another good European side and doing well. But they need pace alongside them.He was very poor yesterday. I have never been a great fan. Centre halfs are normally big and commanding or a bit smaller and fast. If you are lucky you get both. Lindelof is neither. He gets bullied by big forwards like andy Carroll and can't cope with quick players. We need a centre half and to make him a squad player.
Maguire won't be dropped anyway due to the price tag so really there's no decision for the club.
He's the better player I completely agree. Though I don't think there's a huge difference but yeah I'd say Maguire is better.I just think they are to similar players and of the two Maguire even playing on his weaker side still looks the better player.
I still think once everyone is fit and up to speed the defence will be ok this season but we know it has some weak links in it that eventually need addressing
He's the better player I completely agree. Though I don't think there's a huge difference but yeah I'd say Maguire is better.
Not sure the defence is going to be OK though. Well no that's wrong, it will be ok but still flawed. It was ok last year, much improved on the year before but no better now.
They definitely need to add to their attack but they probably need to look to do something in defence too.Agree but look at the other end created almost nothing against Palace a lucky break fell to VDB, Lindelof had a chance from a flick on, Greenwood header but very little created in open play again
I thought it was AWB that lost Saka.