United sign Sergio Romero

Status
Not open for further replies.

se7en

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
10,660
Location
UK
Why not just keep Lindegaard as no.2? He isn't no worse.
 

Sideshow Bob

Avatar & New Members Forum Mod
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
37,286
Van Gaal might have reservations on Lindegaard's distribution. Lindegaard may also want to leave for first team football.

Romero's arrival has been met with a lukewarm reception; what are his weaknesses?
 

JSNFRMN

Moderator
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
21,658
Age
27
Location
Wales
Romero is better than Lindegaard in my opinion. Pretty clear that he isn't favoured, Johnstone has been ahead of him. I'd have liked to have seen Johnstone promoted as backup keeper. Great potential and will probably want to leave now.
 

se7en

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
10,660
Location
UK
I'd rather my goalkeeper be good with hands rather than his feet first and foremost. If Lindegaard is happy to stay I'd rather he was backup rather than someone who isn't that good and doesn't speak english.

It will be a disaster if he starts in goal and I feel it's a pointless signing. We should keep away from Argies.

I'd have preferred Valdes had stayed but not as no.1
 

JSNFRMN

Moderator
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
21,658
Age
27
Location
Wales
Romero is better than Lindegaard with hands too. I wouldn't have signed him but he's an upgrade on Lindegaard. If Lindegaard was as good as some make out, someone would have signed him by now and he'd have played more than 95 first team games by the age of 31.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top