Director of Football set to be appointed

Mr C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
2,366
Was just about to post this. Good read and a good candidate
 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
They’d be mad to appoint him I mean what qualifies him for the job has he ever done a football administrator role at a club.

His behaviour towards Utd when he went to City celebrating goals in front of us in derbies tainted him in my eyes.

While I don’t think it should be an ex player who gets the job would be great if some of the ex players were in his team learning from him. To me the obvious one is Gary Neville but it seems like the class of 92 boys are not that popular with the owners
 

Sideshow Bob

Avatar & New Members Forum Mod
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
37,133
Translation: Andrea Berta, athletic director of Atlético, raises whether to sign for Manchester United once Mourinho has left the English club. has a renewal offer at the club Rojiblanco 2 years but does not know if you face the English project "

 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
Based on their recent signings is he really one to go for?

Atletico have had a lot of expensive flops recently.
 

Mr C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
2,366
I wonder if in fact we will get one, judging by Jose's interview last week, all that was coming for him. We defo should get one though.
 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
Three things stop it from happening.

Woodward's ego won't allow someone to take control.
Glazer's don't care enough to spot that Woodward isn't up to that job.
Money appointing a director of football and the other people that come with that model costs money these people aren't cheap but in theory if you have good structure you don't need a stupidly expensive coach and they should generate value by being smarter in the transfer market.
 

Sideshow Bob

Avatar & New Members Forum Mod
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
37,133
Three things stop it from happening.

Woodward's ego won't allow someone to take control.
Glazer's don't care enough to spot that Woodward isn't up to that job.
Money appointing a director of football and the other people that come with that model costs money these people aren't cheap but in theory if you have good structure you don't need a stupidly expensive coach and they should generate value by being smarter in the transfer market.
If the club decide not to appoint a director of football, I don’t think it will be for any of those reasons.
 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
If the club decide not to appoint a director of football, I don’t think it will be for any of those reasons.
How can it not be down to those 3 things?

The only other reason I'd venture is the they want to cash in and sell it so they'd rather someone else sort out this problem.

I'd probably narrow it down to 2 it's either cost or power. There is absolutely no reason for Utd to continue with a business model that isn't used by any of our major rivals either European or domestic. It made sense when you had Fergie who was everything wrapped into one but that will never happen again. Utd need to shape up or we'll end up being the Blockbuster Video or the Netflix generation.

The owners/board are either prepared to change the structure to try to achieve better value from the spending and in the long run better control cost and therefore make more money which is their long term goal or they go for the it ain't broke don't fix it and carry on as they currently do which is waste fortunes on players who don't perform and managers who don't succeed.

Introducing another level of management will be expensive that's the way business works but you'd hope that bringing in more expertise will reduce the number of mistakes and reduce your inefficiencies in certain areas. I would imagine it Glazer businesses management is kept lean and mean they're cost cutters and management is expensive especially during tough times.

No decision the current regime make will be with the aim of putting Utd back on top of the table it's all about making sure the share price stays nice and high and that there's enough left every year for a nice dividend pay out.
 

Mr C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
2,366
I agree with Bob

I can't believe Woodward would risk his job if all he had to do was employ someone else.

I can't believe successful businessmen like the Glazers don't show an interest.

And's definitely no money.


If they don't don't appoint one, I imagine they have done their due diligence and don't believe that model works. Those 3 options you listed just don't sound feasible ideas from very successful businessmen.
 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
The Glazers don't need the club to win to make money. Utd's share price and profits have shown to be pretty resilient to performance on the pitch winning/losing games doesn't really make them any richer or poorer. They are known as cost cutters they won't spend a penny that doesn't need to be spent so if they don't see the point in bringing in all these expensive resources they won't. These guys from day one have made it very clear it's all about the money to them both short term (dividend payouts) and long terms (share price) at no point do they show any intention of pushing Utd to be the best club on the pitch in the world.

Also, a director of football creates a role where pressure can be applied to the owners publicly they seem to want to retain as much power as possible within their little inner circle hence why Woodward replaced Gill and Ferguson only has an honoury director role, he doesn't actually make decisions. I think they want to retain control rather than give someone else the power to make decisions and Woodward might as well have the last name Glazer as he's very much part of that inner circle.

I also don't see how the model can be ignored I don't think we need someone to be director of football but I do think we need more people with experience of football administration at the very top level involved in the football decision making. The new manager needs to buy into that structure and accept that which most will because your manager should not be dictating your clubs style you should be picking your style and picking managers who fit into that.
 

Mr C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
2,366
They don't need the club to win to make money for sure, but winning increases the revenues. If a DoF means winning more long term, costing less in transfers long term then they will do it.

It's a business to them, if they think it will improve results and transfers they'll get one in my opinion.

It did sound like Jose was pushing for it, rather than the club, so we'll have to see.
 

jsp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,831
Winning comes at a cost though especially if you want to take on Man City.

The key is making every penny count like Liverpool have generally done over the last few years they've been getting the majority right for a few years now we've been getting the big ones wrong. Hindsight is a wonderful thing and all that but they've identified the players they need much better than we have. If you can't out spend them then you've got to out think them somehow and spot things they haven't like Liverpool picked up Robertson for £10m whereas City spent £50m on Mendy.

In theory a bit of a better structure allows us to have the best of both worlds if Utd had a clear strategy from the very top they wouldn't have spent £70m on Lukaku and they probably wouldn't have done that deal for Sanchez either. That lack of structure I think has seen the club waste 100's of millions in the transfer market over the last 5 years and it can't really continue.

Pretty sure someone tried to crunch the numbers on this and the cost of winning a league titles compared to the extra reward that comes with it didn't stack up. Utd can attract huge sponsors without winning, the extra prize money for winning compared to coming 4th isn't massive and neither is the additional TV money.

The only place it really pays to go far is in CL especially if the other teams from your country go out early because you get massive shares of the TV pot.
 

Mr C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
2,366
head of youth development John Murtagh and assistant academy director Tony Whelan have emerged as candidates to become the club's new technical director
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Register now
Top