Awards:
Seems most likely to go to the Arsenal or Italy but would he be a good signing for us? Martinez seems first choice for most people.
Not seen as much of M'Vila as I have of Martinez. Only really seen him playing for France, he's looked very good, where he anchors the midfield. He's a very good passer of the ball but seems more of a holding ball winner although I've heard he's played a more expansive role for Rennes this season. Martinez offers more goals and assists, seems to get around the pitch more. Despite playing most of this season at centre back he's scored 4 goals to M'Vila's 1.
Depends on what you think we need. If it's another disciplined holding player to sit alongside Carrick in a 4-2-3-1 system then maybe M'Vila is the better player. If we're carrying on with a 4-4-2 then Martinez would be the better signing.
Would be very happy with either. They'd both improve our midfield a lot.
Yossi Benayoun plots perfect goodbye as Arsenal eye Yann M'Vila | Football | guardian.co.uk
Bargain at less than £20million. The player that Arsenal need.
I'd love him at United, but he's Arsenal bound. I'd love Martinez, but I can't see us paying around £30m for him & I think he'll go to City or R.Mardid.
Awards:
Awards:
Awards:
This guy was being linked with Arsenal and Spurs + some biggish European clubs in the summer and now Fulham and QPR.
It's because of his attitude. If he had a good attitude he'd be at a big side now, but the fee is about £8m. If he comes here and impresses then QPR could double the transfer fee.
Awards:
Redknapp on M'Vila: "the deal looks okay."
Awards:
Posting Permissions
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks